The Gender Agenda — research and evidence
There are two important resources for research and evidence that relate to
gender and pupil achievement: the Teacher Training Resource Bank
(TTRB) and Multiverse, the website providing materials on the
educational achievement of pupils from diverse backgrounds. Both have a
useful and comprehensive range of resources and you will find
additional content here such as an item broadcast on Teachers TV.
Below are summaries of the key resources on gender to be found on the TTRB
site. All the links you need are at the foot of the page.
Gap Buster summary report July 08v5: 'Schools that close the
attainment gap between boys and girls in English'
This report summarises research carried out during spring 2008
into seven primary and nine secondary schools in England that had consistently
closed or narrowed the attainment gap between boys and girls in English, and
identifies the factors that contributed to that success.
White boys from low-income backgrounds: good practice in
schools
This report from Ofsted is a small survey of good practice in
the education of white boys from low-income backgrounds.
Gender and education: the evidence on pupils in
England
Published in 2007, this document presents evidence on pupil gender
differences from the Reception Year to the Sixth Form. It includes
statistics, international performance data and research reports and considers
factors such as social class and ethnicity.
Ensuring the attainment of white working class boys in
English
A small project focusing on possible routes to raising
achievement in white working class boys; a group identified as being at
risk of underachieving.
Raising Boys' Achievements in Writing
This 2004 UKLA/PNS publication presents the findings of a project designed to
raise boys' engagement, motivation and achievements in writing.
Its planning and teaching model involved generating ideas for writing
using visual stimuli and included new technologies alongside model making,
artwork and puppetry.
Raising boys achievement
The University of Cambridge produced this report of a four-year project
(2000-2004). It found the differential most marked in Key Stage
2 English and Key Stage 4 results. The research sought to identify
strategies that made improvements and it also challenges interpretations of
boys' underachievement.
Tackling low educational achievement
Produced by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation in 2007, this report uses data from
the Pupil Level Annual School Census and the National Pupil Database of all
students reaching the age of 16 in 2003. Setting out four different measures of
low educational achievement, the report goes back to previous primary
school records and investigates the persistently poor educational achievement
of pupils from poor families; those who have a special educational needs, or
who are in the care of the local authority.
'Underachievement' — from the
Behaviour4Learning glossary
This definition of 'underachievement' guards against the
labelling of any pupil as an underachiever, 'as it can lead to
self-fulfilling prophecies'. It acknowledges, however, that certain
population groupings do not achieve the same results as the average and that
this varies by age, subject, region, social class: it also varies by the
methods used in assessment.
Why Don't Boys Do Well in English? (Teachers TV
Clip: 'Hot Research')
A short report that looks at how to improve boys' performance in
school, particularly in English, where the gender gap is most pronounced.
Professor Debra Myhill of Exeter University stresses the importance of the link
between participation in class and achievement. She advocates an active
teaching style that has high expectations of all children in the class
and avoids stereo-typing.
Girls and Exclusion: rethinking the
agenda — A. Osler & K. Vincent (2003)
Osler and Vincent argue that girls' exclusion is an under-examined issue
that has long-term, harmful consequences - and merits urgent
re-consideration and action.
Educational Inequality: Mapping Race, Class and
Gender — D.Gillborn & H. Mirza (Ofsted 2000)
This report analyses the three variables of the separate effects of race, class
or gender together. The groups surveyed are African-Caribbean,
Pakistani and Bangladeshi pupils. Focusing on secondary school age girls, Osler
and Vincent examine the causes, effects, implications and processes involved in
different types of educational exclusion.
'How do boys and girls differ in their use of
ICT?'
This 2008 briefing paper from Becta (British Educational Communications
and Technology Agency), explores the differences between boys' and
girls' use of ICT, both within and outside school, and for both educational
and leisure purposes. A particular focus of this briefing is on how girls use
of ICT, what impact it has on them, and whether they are disadvantaged by the
increasing use of ICT in education.
Related documents
- The impact of Reading Recovery on the gender gap
- Gender and education: the evidence on pupils in England
- Ensuring the attainment of white working class boys in English
- Raising Boys' Achievements in Writing
- Raising boys achievement
- Tackling low educational achievement
- Underachievement — Behaviour4Learning glossary
- Why Don't Boys Do Well in English?
Teachers TV Clip: 'Hot Research' - Girls and Exclusion: rethinking the agenda -
A. Osler & K. Vincent (2003) - Educational Inequality: Mapping Race, Class and
Gender
D. Gillborn & H. Mirza (Ofsted 2000) - 'How do boys and girls differ in their use of
ICT?'
BECTA briefing paper
The Gender Agenda Events and seminars 2008
Last updated: 15 December 2008


